The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
do you find that that any of these I don't use it very often go ahead I'm sorry oh no no I'm sorry uh do you find that um the time that a woman was um you know deficient of hormones the longer that period of time the greater the likelihood she will need additional treatments beyond the systemic estrogen yeah thank you for asking well so the tissue changes are progressive right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as time progresses either the stemach hormone if they're on it is going to be enough because it's just enough to leak into that tissue and not have the tissue changes be or they're going to start to need it because 5 to 10 even 15 years out