The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
actually looking at your blood work to assess what is the release from my pituitary down to my goonan to actually produce the testosterone what is that signal and is it deficient so do I have a in range high normal like what does it look like on my blood work of my lutenizing hormone LH and FSH and if it looks to be adequate or even high would be even more indicating if something's wrong
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So you would if you're primary hypoganatal you would see the reflection typically of high gonadotropens um or you would also see some sort of like structural defects and that's where you would get into like you know ultrasounding for I think the prevalence in males is like 15% of males have a varicus seal.