The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so they went and they did the same test on human subjects healthy men and they found that healthy men had 70-fold more activated dht levels in their stools than circulating in their blood which implicates this hormone as a massive reservoir inside of our guts and dht as its gatekeepers so it decides what leaves and what stays and recirculates
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the first thing is that they found that these mice that had the ability to have a microbiome and thereby deglucoronidate dht turn it back into its active form those mice when you measured their stool samples they had 20x the amount of activated dht in their stools as we're circulating in their blood