The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the growth hormone response to exercise appears to be mostly substrate driven that it's that growth hormone probably increases as a response to exercise to increase lipolysis to liberate free fatty acids for use uh uh as an energy substrate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
growth hormone not anabolic to skeletal muscle uh and the growth hormone response to exercise appears to be mostly substrate driven that it's that growth hormone probably increases as a response to exercise to increase lipolysis to liberate free fatty acids for use as an energy substrate
In the case of growth hormone, it's actually a fat mobilizing hormone. That's one of its great side effects. If you're taking exogenous growth hormone, you notice you get leaner. It probably doesn't do much for your muscle.