The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
which of course not only happens in the man who we talked about who was hypogonadal before their diagnosis or before their treatment but frankly only you know 50 to 60% of men will actually recover normal levels of tea after 2 years of hormonal depression anyway so you're really talking about inducing more hypogonadism in those men than you would have um you know even before
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.