We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
HRT is serious business and um I I think I do think a lot of people are doing it incorrectly um and I think there are a lot of really irresponsible people out there who are uh you know frankly just practicing dangerous medicine if not veterinary medicine outright
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
HRT is serious business and um I I think I do think a lot of people are doing it incorrectly um and I think there are a lot of really irresponsible people out there who are uh you know frankly just practicing dangerous medicine if not veterinary medicine outright
For symptomatic perimenopausal women under 60, hormone replacement therapy reduces all-cause mortality.
The breast-cancer risk attributed to HRT in the original WHI trial was overstated and the timing window matters most.