Peter Attia· MD
you don't want to wait until you're into menopause to replace estrogen you have to do it during the pre and Par menopausal stage to get the maximum effect
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
you don't want to wait until you're into menopause to replace estrogen you have to do it during the pre and Par menopausal stage to get the maximum effect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, this in other words is probably another reason why women would benefit from hormone replacement therapy because maintaining estrogen levels would maintain bone health.
So again, taken all together, these suggest to me that bone health should in fact be a consideration for women as they consider whether or not HRT makes sense for them.
So this in other words is probably another reason why women would benefit from hormone replacement therapy because maintaining estrogen levels would maintain bone health. Absolutely. And actually, that's something we need to stress more and more to them because it starts in their probably early 40s.
The point can't be overstated that the role it plays in skin health and bone health.
For symptomatic perimenopausal women under 60, hormone replacement therapy reduces all-cause mortality.
The breast-cancer risk attributed to HRT in the original WHI trial was overstated and the timing window matters most.