The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and one of the limitations of that was all I could look at was your HRV I didn't necessarily have any idea what else was being tied to that and so I could look at the change and ask you a bunch of questions and maybe try to figure out what those changes were coming from but I wanted to create something that also tied in training and sleep and subjective markers and other metrics so that as a coach which I just had a more complete story of what was happening
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and so I wanted to create something that people could use their phones and that we could get way more data from and that was my first system Bio Force HRV 2011 and that was really one of the earliest HRV apps out there where we could you know take your phone you could do a recording and you could get your HRV on your own you didn't need uh to come into the gym