The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
people with really high hrvs I don't think this becomes an issue at least in more pie until you're in the 90s or resting heart rates in the low to mid- 40s your your HRV is already very very high that laying down you're taking something that responsiveness away if you start getting those categories you probably want to take it seated
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
RSD you're talking 120s 130s 150 you get up in those ranges you probably want to take it seated