The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the other thing that kind of would strike you as you dig a little deeper is his fibrinogen which is an inflammatory marker is 495 just a little bit outside of normal and his highly sensitive c-reactive protein is 1.3 again most people wouldn't think anything of it most people think anything below two is fine we kind of like to see it below one that's a bit odd
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.