The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
most of these trials are single arm uh you know uncontrolled studies and it's actually quite hard to create to create a control group in Hyperbaric Oxygen's um studies because you you can tell when the chamber is being pressurized and so to try and create a scenario where you have a sham effect that may create the same Placebo is quite tricky
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's there's a problem with uh with the studies that have been done because the DoD funded a study where they did hyperbaric oxygen and the control was hyperbaric air, right? So hyperbaric oxygen is 100% oxygen, you know, it increased. >> So you're still getting hyperbaric exposure to 20% oxygen. >> Yeah. So the control was just hyperbaric pressure and then both groups got benefits.