The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So the DoD wants to put a nail in this coffin. So they actually funded my university, University of South Florida. We have six beautiful chambers in a facility that's run by the neurosurgery and neuroscience department and uh my friend Dr. Joe Dur kind of runs the facility there. Uh which is putting putting a nail in this coffin. So they have subjects with PTSD and also subjects with with brain injury, but it's more of a PTSD trial. And they have a sham.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.