Peter Attia· MD
for things like a stroke you can start showing an increased risk from 120 over 80 to 140 over 90.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for things like a stroke you can start showing an increased risk from 120 over 80 to 140 over 90.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
epidemiologic studies showed that even a blood pressure of like 140 over 90 conferred increased risk it just was much less than the 170. so at 170 it just takes off it's almost the line goes up vertically but between 140 and 160 there's still in stepwise increased risk but it's just a kind of a more gradual risk