Peter Attia· MD
they both seem to play a causal role
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
they both seem to play a causal role
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and now on the causal side you know it's interesting I don't think there would be any dispute from any reasonable person on the causality of apob um hypertension
The next two are actually, because they are so cross-correlated you can't actually distinguish which one is more important, are hypertension and elevated ApoB or LDL particle number. And, again, ApoB is the single best biomarker or LDL-P to distinguish your risk of cardiac disease. It trumps LDL cholesterol, it trumps non-HDL cholesterol, it trumps triglycerides, HDL cholesterol.