The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the same is true with blood pressure we don't have a hypertensive study that looked at people age 25 to 35 or 35 to 45 where we reduce blood pressure and showed a dramatic reduction in events because they probably weren't going to have the events in the time Horizon of the study and so the reason it's very easy for any physician to treat hypertension in a 35 year old is because they're treating the causal agent
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.