Peter Attia· MD
i'm a believer that 140 over 90 is a good mark for where we should be viewing hypertension as a condition that really should involve you know active management
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i'm a believer that 140 over 90 is a good mark for where we should be viewing hypertension as a condition that really should involve you know active management
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and i i'm a believer that 140 over 90 is a good mark for where we should be uh viewing hypertension um as a condition that really should involve you know active management
and I I'm a a believer that 140 or 90 is a good Mark for where we should be uh viewing hypertension um as a condition that really should involve you know active management