Peter Attia· MD
how is it defined today in most places of the world it's defined as a blood pressure greater than 140 over 90. 140 over 90 or higher but in this country uh recently it was redefined as being greater than 130 over 80.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
how is it defined today in most places of the world it's defined as a blood pressure greater than 140 over 90. 140 over 90 or higher but in this country uh recently it was redefined as being greater than 130 over 80.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
how is it defined today in most places of the world it's defined as a blood pressure greater than 140 over 90. 140 over 90 or higher but in this country uh recently it was redefined as being greater than 130 over 80.
there was there was a category for normal Ah that's right so it was normal was actually 120 to 130 over 80 to 85 borderline was 130 to 140 over 85 to 90 and it was only then hypertension if you were greater than 140 over 90
how is it defined today in most places of the world it's defined as a blood pressure greater than 140 over 90 140 over 90 or higher um but in this country uh recently it was redefined as being greater than 130 over 80