The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And it comes down to the fact that we just have such a clear understanding of how the disease works and we have exceptional biomarkers, right? So we we can measure the things that are causing the disease. We can measure inflammation. We can measure apo. We can measure VLDLDL cholesterol, LP little A. We also we can measure blood pressure. We can measure metabolic health.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.