Peter Attia· MD
it's thought to be clinically significant when you can lower diastolic by more than like three millimeters and when you can lower your systolic by like more than four or five millimeters that's really thought to be
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's thought to be clinically significant when you can lower diastolic by more than like three millimeters and when you can lower your systolic by like more than four or five millimeters that's really thought to be
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.