Peter Attia· MD
at 135 over 85 you could roll around at that blood pressure indefinitely without any damage to the kidney yes exactly so there's relatively minimal risk with a blood pressure 135 over 85.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
at 135 over 85 you could roll around at that blood pressure indefinitely without any damage to the kidney yes exactly so there's relatively minimal risk with a blood pressure 135 over 85.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the person whose blood pressure is 135 over 85 relative to 120 over 80 is going to have lower renal function at the end of their life
it but however it's uh in epidemiology studies over many years you can show that you know 120 over 80 is superior to 135 over 85.
it it it but however it's uh in epidemiology studies over many years you can show that you know 120 over 80 is superior to 135 over 85.