Peter Attia· MD
at 135 over 85 you could roll around at that blood pressure indefinitely without any damage to the kidney yes exactly so there's relatively minimal risk with a blood pressure 135 over 85.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
at 135 over 85 you could roll around at that blood pressure indefinitely without any damage to the kidney yes exactly so there's relatively minimal risk with a blood pressure 135 over 85.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yes exactly so there there's relatively minimal risk with a blood pressure 135 over 85 it it but however it's uh in epidemiology studies over many years you can show that you know 120 over 80 is superior to 135 over 85