The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know, when we were in the jungle, um if we were under threat, if, you know, it was it was survival of the fittest, the first thing that would happen, say there's a saber-toothed tiger around the corner, is that your body gets ready for the attack, right? So, you don't bleed to death. And of course, how would you do that? You increase clotting factors in your blood, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.