The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But the L retains signaling effects that D does. So for example the NLR NLRP3 inflammosome, right? So the nature medicine paper in 2015 doesn't seem to be an antimer specific. So the D will suppress it. So that's important because if the L gets elevated in the brain then it could inhibit neuroinflammation and inflammatory processes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.