The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The immune system is uh an incredibly tenuous system, which is in really delicate balance. So the balance is too much immunity. You might say, well, this is good protection against cancer, protection against uh microbes, right? But then you get autoimmunity. But then you get autoimmunity. Not enough immunity. Well, you you run the risk of being, you know, killed by a pneumonia or some kind of infection, but at least you don't have too much inflammation.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.