The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so what will start to happen is you'll get an inflammation on the top of the big toe yeah okay then and and is the primary pathology just the repeated jamming of that toe right the instability at the the first Ray and then you they can't drop the B the first metd down so they start to irritate the top of the joint it'll be red it'll be swollen
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.