Peter Attia· MD
we actually shorten your sleep opportunity we crunch that down it's one of the tools that we have in the cb that's right you want to drive the efficiency up by taking the denominator out
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we actually shorten your sleep opportunity we crunch that down it's one of the tools that we have in the cb that's right you want to drive the efficiency up by taking the denominator out
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so it's not what you do is by compressing that window down you're sleeping less and you're building up more of that sleep pressure because as a consequence of the reduction of sleep opportunity time you're going to be awake during the day longer the longer that you're awake the more of that sleep pressure you build up
and the caveat that comes for people with insomnia though that i'm here saying you need to increase your time in bed your sleep opportunity as i call it to make sure that you get the right total amount of sleep and you have to accept there's inefficiency in the system and you need to extend your time in bed to overcome that slight inefficiency