We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so when you use a class of drugs that increases endogenous insulin production and or when you use more insulin what you reduce is the glucose and what you reduce are the micro vascular complications you do not save lives they're still getting cancer they're still getting heart disease you're still getting Alzheimer's disease at a much higher rate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If the glucose were the main pathogenic signal, this should result in improved outcomes and nothing gets better. When you give a type 2 diabetic an insulin therapy, they get fatter and sicker and die faster. All while glucose looks good. This is well documented. Their risk of dying from heart disease triples. Their risk of getting dying from cancer doubles when you give them insulin.