The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the third looking at 30 versus 90 is a big insight and you're right I mean Joseph Kraft who is a pathologist who has done a lot of work on this he samples to five hours now again clinically that's challenging in the regular day to day practice but in the laboratory that's feasible and you're right you can see so much happening beyond that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.