The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he had this essential core idea which was carbohydrates caused by glucose excursions and that he has the so-called rule of small numbers which says that if you consume more carbs you need more insulin and therefore there's a greater opportunity to make a mistake and so if you've consumed fewer carbs you will consume less insulin and you'll have fewer mistakes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.