We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
i think that's a falsehood like you couldn't do that without a constant iv of sugar into your body like you know even if you're eating you would essentially have to be eating cheetos and corn chips like 20 hours a day
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
those in the low carb space who I respect will sometimes argue that most insulin resistance is insulin induced meaning that hyperinsulinemia eating more carbohydrates spikes your insulin and this leads to insulin resistance this is just false there's no good evidence for this in Free Living humans
the claim that most insulin resistance is insulin induced meaning that hyperinsulinemia eating more carbohydrates spikes your insulin and this leads to insulin resistance this is just false there's no good evidence for this in Free Living humans
this is the whole Paradigm of insulin resistance is predominant driven by hyperinsulinemia which is driven by too many carbohydrates
Insulin induced insulin resistance, this idea that eating too many carbohydrates leads to insulin resistance in humans, this has really never been shown in real human clinical data.
on the other side of the coin those in the low carb space who I respect will sometimes argue that most insulin resistance is insulin induced meaning that hyperinsulinemia eating more carbohydrates spikes your insulin and this leads to insulin resistance this is just false there's no good evidence for this in Free Living humans