We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
found just the opposite to what randall predicted they got insulin resistance which is what he would have said but not through his mechanism he said g6p should go up we saw it go down and we saw glucose go down so it wasn't through inhibition of glycolysis as he said it's somehow interfering with the insulin activation of transport
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.