The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at the native population you look at the Inuit and Eskimos in the colder regions they've obviously got very low insulin resistance but then look at the Pima Indians and others that migrated to southern sort of areas of the world they have much higher risk of insulin resistance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
even with India when you look at the country itself in the northern parts that are near the Himalayas you have some of the lowest incidents of insulin resistance so there's a place called montipora which is near the himalayas and they have single digits basically in some resistance and diabetes the highest rates of diabetes in India are further south near the equator so Kerala has by far the highest I mean the prevalence er is up to 20 percent