The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
people who have high levels of mtor activation in igf-1 typically have insulin resistance they have poor dietary habits and poor lifestyle habits so I would say that it okay that's a a fair point there there's confounding variables but all these things are tied up together you can't really separate them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when you look at mtor elevations that that lead to cancer and whatnot those originate at what i would say mostly insulin resistance so you're having elevations and insulin you're having elevations and insulin signaling through akt which which can then transmit to mtor and so it's like this chronic kind of low level pushing that button right
people who have high levels of mtor activation and igf-1 typically have insulin resistance they have poor dietary habits and poor lifestyle habits so i would say that it okay that's a fair point there there's confounding variables but all these things are tied up together you can't really separate them
because people who have high levels of mtor activation in igf-1 typically have insulin resistance they have poor dietary habits and poor lifestyle habits so I would say that it okay that's a a fair point there there's confounding variables but all these things are tied up together you can't really separate them