The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the simple fact is we don't understand the genetic basis in part because diabetes in my opinion is a very poor phenotype diabetes is a very heterogeneous disease so when we talk about diabetes if that's your phenotype it's not surprising to me that it's going to be difficult to Define genes that are related to diabetes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.