The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I don't think humans should ignore an apob I think you should know your apob level I think you should know your LDL I think you should know what your thyroid is doing your T3 your free T3 had better be in the normal reference range you should know what your genetics are doing you should know your insulin sensitivity you should have a fasting insulin you should probably have a fasting glucose you should be lean you should be healthy you should be a healthy human
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.