The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
We actually see that your postprandial glucose response looks a little bit abnormal. We think that you're prediabetic. Your fasting glucose is 95 or 92 or 87, but we think there's something going on here. Let's just check a fasting insulin.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when we take a patient who has normal fasting glucose and normal fasting insulin and we challenge them with an oral glycemic load and then measure insulin and glucose in 30 minute intervals a lot of times we expose a problem that seems most easily explained by the muscle's inability to assimilate glycogen