The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the maintenance of the muscle uh certainly the one has to understand that maintenance will only get you so far it becomes more difficult to build muscle as you age depending on how you live your life and the reason that is is because because hormones decline if an individual is not on hormone replacement there is just a natural decline it's also thought that skeletal muscle which is a nutrient sensing organ becomes increasingly insulin resistant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I kind of think of as insulin resistance is also being anabolic resistance because you're not able to really accumulate muscle mass as well as you could it really creates a pretty depressing picture of how individuals age and become depressed later on in life