The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
why because you're actually getting rid of the actual problem you're emptying out the body of this glucose which is what was making them sick in the first place as opposed to simply moving it around and that I think is the explanation as to why sglt2 s are so so effective for organ protection which we never saw before because now you're actually treating the underlying problem of too much whole body glucose as opposed to too much glucose in the blood
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the beauty of this sglt2 Inhibitors are only in the kidney they're not in your muscle they're not in your beta cell and the only thing that the sglt2 Inhibitors do makes you put glucose out in the urine the only change in the plasma was the glucose came down and now insulin sensitivity improved in muscle in beta cell function improved