The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
never say oh your blood sugar fasting is 97 you need to do X Y or Z differently nananana 97 that's above 95 and that's my cutoff of normal for brain health memory and cognitive function which is less than the 100 cutoff which in med school it was 125 and then 116 a residency it's 100 and hopefully
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.