The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in 1997 a science paper appeared that made it the best day of my life and the worst day of my life okay Wow what was the paper the paper was taking in nematode okay so a primitive model decreasing the insulin sensitivity this is known as the daf-2 model and when you do that the nematode accumulates fat in their intestinal cell so they are becoming visceral obese and they leave several times longer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you took a worm that normally lives 2 weeks and you turned down its insulin receptor slightly not off correct right but you made it insulin resistant and it was accumulating fat