The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
using this approach we found fat inside the muscle was the best predictor for this block and transport in all of our volunteers young people old people children sedentary individuals sedentary individuals fat inside the cells the best predictor for instant resistance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that it is going to be somewhat of an outdated metric. I believe that interuscular atapost tissue this IMAT is going to be much more predictive of disease and this came from I interviewed on my podcast Melanie Cree and we were talking about PCOS and I'm thinking metabolic PCOS what is the body fat percentage that's going to change the outcome and she looked at me she goes Gabrielle it has nothing to do with body fat percent it had to do with their interuscular atapost tissue And that I think is going to be an upcoming theme. It's much more specific to insulin resistance and these metabolic outcomes that we care about.
It's much more specific to insulin resistance and these metabolic outcomes that we care about.