The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now, when people are diabetic or when people have pre-diabetes, we also see derangements in fasting glucose, which is generally a reflection of inappropriate gluconeogenesis, which is the liver making inadequate or inappropriate amounts of glucose even when you're not eating.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you are insulin resistant and your blood sugar is going up because your liver is doing inappropriate gluconeogenesis that is harmful for humans