The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when they start to add in carbs things start to reverse in the opposite direction as the carbs stimulate an insulin response lower the uh gluconeogenesis lower the fatty acid oxidation and you start to see an increase oxidation of carbs peripherally and an insulin sensitivity improves
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what happened was is they drove the fatty acid oxidation they kept increasing gluconeogenesis because you need blood glucose so your liver if you don't have the blood glucose is going to make it and so they kept driving that pathway and then what eventually happened is you have this the gluconeogenesis and worse peripheral insulin sensitivity the cells are not responding to insulin and the carbohydrates just going higher and higher and higher and you're seeing this higher levels of carbohydrate long term in the bloodstream