The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we have to imagine that if carogene is bad for humans it's bad for us because it's damaging the gut that something about this long-chain sulfated polysaccharide that we probably never saw much of evolutionarily and perhaps is some sort of a plant defense molecule in these aquatic plants is actually harming our gut and causing some degree of leaky gut and what an interesting connection that is between leaky gut and insulin resistance overall inflammation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.