The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the fact that we don't appreciate that by the time you get to pre-diabetes there's some really serious things going on here you know their their vision is being impacted you know their nerves are being impacted you know these are things we can't just say oh they haven't they haven't gotten bad enough to bother with because they're not at you know the criteria for type 2 diabetes yet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.