We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
these NMR profiles are they're really they're too sensitive they're not specific enough for what we are looking for so by too sensitive I mean they're giving all sorts of triggers and saying there's lots of cardiovascular risk when I don't believe there's any real good correlation or indication of cardiovascular risk with what it's showing me here
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.