The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the why behind why neurotransmitters are disordered is what we're talking about today and that is where things really get cool because we are starting to understand and I think that it's not even mainstream psychiatry yet when I was in residency nobody was really talking about why neurotransmitters are disordered or neuro inflammation or insulin resistance in the brain or mitochondrial dysfunction in the brain or disordered glucose metabolism in the brain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.