The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these patients were you glycemic i mean that to me is the staggering piece of this these patients are still potentially a decade away from seeing an interference in glucose homeostasis... and yet they're already seeing an 80 increase in triglyceride
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the average doc who's out there doing lipid levels is going to see a triglyceride maybe between 130 and 160 180 what you said every once in a while you'll see a 3400 but they're less common that almost is always insulin resistance as the idiology of that