Paul Saladino· MD
of 30 minutes a day outside of 140 mg per deciliter might be a real problem for humans physiologically.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
of 30 minutes a day outside of 140 mg per deciliter might be a real problem for humans physiologically.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
There's also prospective studies that are showing, you know, people who hit a certain threshold in that postprandial response are more likely to develop diabetes down the road even if their glucose was, quote unquote, normal by our traditional diabetic diagnostic criteria.
So, what we know from that is that a lot of the initial glucose dysregulation, so um, patterns that might be setting off some red flags, actually happen in that postprandial response first.
And what we know is that a lot of normal glycemic individuals, normal as in those traditional metrics, sometimes up to a quarter of them will show dysregulated glucose levels uh, in that postprandial response.