The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
dnl is significant and it is a significant contributor to metabolic fatty liver disease and again especially if you track it chronically in patients who are continuously high carb feeding especially high sucrose high fructose corn syrup we want to get into that but fructose basically gets funneled into the liver into the dnl pathway it's ubiquitous you can push dnl to be significant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.